In knowledge discovery applications, the pattern set generated from data can be tremendously large and hard to explore by analysts. In the Formal Concept Analysis (FCA) framework, there have been studies to identify important formal concepts through the stability index and other quality measures. In this paper, we introduce the Base-Equivalent Conceptual Relevance (BECR) score, a novel conceptual relevance interestingness measure for improving the identification of actionable concepts. From a conceptual perspective, the base and equivalent attributes are considered meaningful information and are highly essential to maintain the conceptual structure of concepts. Thus, the basic idea of BECR is that the more base and equivalent attributes and minimal generators a concept intent has, the more relevant it is. As such, BECR quantifies these attributes and minimal generators per concept intent. Our preliminary experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets show the efficiency of BECR compared to the well-known stability index.

Discovering meaningful conceptual structures is a substantial task in data mining and knowledge discovery applications. While off-the-shelf interestingness indices defined in Formal Concept Analysis may provide an effective relevance evaluation in several situations, they frequently give inadequate results when faced with massive formal contexts (and concept lattices), and in the presence of irrelevant concepts. In this paper, we introduce the Conceptual Relevance (CR) score, a new scalable interestingness measurement for the identification of actionable concepts. From a conceptual perspective, the minimal generators provide key information about their associated concept intent. Furthermore, the relevant attributes of a concept are those that maintain the satisfaction of its closure condition. Thus, the guiding idea of CR exploits the fact that minimal generators and relevant attributes can be efficiently used to assess concept relevance. As such, the CR index quantifies both the amount of conceptually relevant attributes and the number of the minimal generators per concept intent. Our experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets show the efficiency of this measure over the well-known stability index.

Identifying important actors (or nodes) in a two-mode network often remains a crucial challenge in mining, analyzing, and interpreting real-world networks. While traditional bipartite centrality indices are often used to recognize key nodes that influence the network information flow, they frequently produce poor results in intricate situations such as massive networks with complex local structures or a lack of complete knowledge about the network topology and certain properties. In this paper, we introduce Bi-face (BF), a new bipartite centrality measurement for identifying important nodes in two-mode networks. Using the powerful mathematical formalism of Formal Concept Analysis, the BF measure exploits the faces of concept intents to identify nodes that have influential bicliques connectivity and are not located in irrelevant bridges. Unlike off-the shelf centrality indices, it quantifies how a node has a cohesive-substructure influence on its neighbour nodes via bicliques while not being in network core-peripheral ones through its absence from non-influential bridges. Our experiments on several real-world and synthetic networks show the efficiency of BF over existing prominent bipartite centrality measures such as betweenness, closeness, eigenvector, and vote-rank among others.

The output of an association rule miner is often huge in practice. This is why several concise lossless representations have been proposed, such as the "essential" or "representative" rules. We revisit the algorithm given by Kryszkiewicz (Int. Symp. Intelligent Data Analysis 2001, Springer-Verlag LNCS 2189, 350-359) for mining representative rules. We show that its output is sometimes incomplete, due to an oversight in its mathematical validation. We propose alternative complete generators and we extend the approach to an existing closure-aware basis similar to, and often smaller than, the representative rules, namely the basis B*.